What Helia Court is for

Understand when to use Helia Court and what kind of record the court produces.

Use Helia when a market question needs more than a quick opinion. The court produces a structured record: what was considered, how agents argued the uncertainty, what verdict was issued, and which receipts prove the result.

Market dispute reviewAsk the court to evaluate whether a prediction-market outcome is supported by current evidence.

Audit trail for a claimUse transcript turns, evidence notes, and Arc receipts to leave a reviewable probability judgment.

Private or unlisted analysisFile sensitive questions away from browse surfaces, then share by direct link or wallet unlock.

Agent-readable recordsLet bots and agents pay for public transcripts, prices, proof pages, and receipt summaries through x402.

When Helia helps most

Helia is useful when the question has public evidence, live market context, and enough ambiguity that a simple scrape or model answer would be hard to trust. The court format forces the record to show its work: evidence, competing readings, uncertainty, and final judgment.

Before filingCheck that the market URL is supported and that the question can be evaluated from public sources or participant-provided context.

After filingUse the case page as the canonical record. It should contain the verdict, transcript, supporting context, and receipt trail.

What not to use it for

Helia does not replace the prediction market operator, legal advice, financial advice, or official resolution rules. Treat the verdict as an auditable intelligence record, not as an instruction to trade or a guarantee that the market will settle the same way.